Month: July 2009

Aldermen at odds over airport fuel tax

Posted by – July 24, 2009

Quincy Aldermen Mike Farha, R-4, and Steve Duesterhaus, D-2, were at odds this week over an issue at Quincy Regional Airport.

Their disagreement came at the end of Monday’s City Council meeting when Farha made a motion to direct the city’s legal department to strike certain language from the city’s lease agreement with the fixed-based operator related to the collection of “fuel flowage fees.”

“The intent of this resolution would be to end the collection of fuel flowage fees,” Farha said, referring to the 7-cents-per-gallon tax paid by airport patrons who buy fuel from the fixed-based operator, Curtis Aviation.

This got Duesterhaus riled. He made the following comment in response to Farha’s motion:

“The Aeronautics Committee has repeatedly declined to take action as the alderman proposes. He proposes opening an excess of $30,000 hole in the budget without proposing any means to fill that hole. And we already subsidize that operation very heavily. Those proceeds are used to reduce that operating deficit to maintain the facilities that we own out there — the fueling facilities being one — and I would dare say this is not a burden on the people that use that fuel. So I really don’t know what this proposal stems from, but I would encourage members (aldermen) to make a choice right here and decline to direct the corporation counsel to draft this language.”

Farha responded to Duesterhaus’ comments by asserting that the fuel flowage fee is simply a tax and “is not our money.” He said it belongs to those who pay the tax, which is an investment into the airport.

“It’s their money,” he said. “I’m not asking to increase anything, to change anything, other than return the investment that those people have made in the airport.”

Farha said he would be “happy to propose a variety of cuts at any point in time” to make up for the lost revenue. But he feels more incentives are needed to spark additional activity at the airport.

“Ten years ago we had 12,000 enplanements on the commercial side. We had a lot of activity on the business side. Today at that airport we have less than 1,200 enplanements, and we don’t have the same level of activity,” Farha said. “Cutting the tax, cutting the fee, has been shown over and over and over to increase activity. That’s all I want to do.”

Mayor John Spring called for a voice vote on Farha’s motion. From the audience, it sounded like an equal numbers of “ayes” and “nays” were verbalized. Spring declared: “In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it.”

The resolution will appear on the agenda for Monday’s meeting, which will be held at the Quincy Public Library annex, 514 York.

Speaking of the agenda, the original agenda came out at noon Friday as usual. Then according to a new procedure that Spring put in place this week, City Clerk Jenny Hayden waited two hours to see if anyone from the public would ask to speak to the council on any of the listed agenda items.

No one did.

However, one person who had come forward earlier in the week to ask for the opportunity to speak subsequently came forward Friday and asked to have his name withdrawn.

Spring to implement agenda change

Posted by – July 21, 2009

Mayor John Spring today said he plans to move forward with his proposal to give residents an extra two-hour window after the weekly meeting agenda is finalized on Fridays to sign up to speak on any agenda item that interests them.

Spring said he talked with City Clerk Jenny Hayden after Monday’s council meeting and they agreed to institute the new program this week.

Under the plan, the council’s agenda will be posted on the city’s Web site by noon on Friday. Residents will then have until 2 p.m. to look over the agenda and put in a request with the city clerk to speak to any agenda item. Residents can also, as before, put in a request to talk about any other subject they wish.

Up until now, the deadline to sign up for comments was 11 a.m. Friday. But since that was the same deadline for finalizing the agenda, residents had no way to know if there was a topic on the agenda they’d like to address.

Spring hopes this new system will appease that concern.

However, the idea doesn’t satisfy Michael Black, the Quincy resident who filed a petition with the city asking that an open public forum be allowed as part of each council meeting.

“Mayor Spring’s two-hour window is a flippant response” to the request for more public voice at council meetings, Black said in an e-mailed statement.

He said the proposed ordinance presented Monday night by Alderman Jennifer Lepper would handle the agenda-addressing question “a lot better” because it would give residents until noon Monday to sign up to speak on any agenda topic. That’s a 72-hour window compared to the two-hour window Spring is instituting.

“And the proposal by the mayor does not eliminate the voting, which is what started this whole thing in the first place and is addressed by the new ordinance,” Black said.

“All I can say is that the mayor is completely out of touch with what the citizens of Quincy want. Every citizen I’ve talked to or seen Web comments on supports this basic idea. Fear of the public seems incongruous with being a public servant. I hope the citizens of Quincy take notice when the next election comes up.”

Lepper’s proposed ordinance, which was given first reading Monday, would allow a forum to be held during each council meeting without a vote of aldermen, with up to six speaking slots available. Each person would be able to talk for three minutes.

Alderman Steve Duesterhaus objected after Lepper tried to push the ordinance through by dispensing with the need for three readings. One of his main gripes is that the ordinance would take away the council’s right to decide whether public comment on a particular subject is appropriate.

Corporation Counsel Andrew Staff interjected that it would take a two-thirds vote of the council — essentially 10 votes — to dispense with the second and third readings because the proposed ordinance involves “taking away the City Council’s ability to vote on something.”

Staff also gave his opinion that the city already has a “public access ordinance” that allows public speakers. And Lepper’s proposed ordinance, he said, “is going to be more restrictive than the existing ordinance. The existing ordinance allows any number of people to register to speak. The policy is a five-minute limitation. This ordinance is actually going to limit the speakers to six and actually provide a three-limit limitation, so this is going to be a more restrictive ordinance.”

Black also had a response to Monday’s developments.

“The City Council (just the Democrats I might add) are going to great lengths to prevent the citizens of Quincy from having a free voice,” he wrote, in part.

“Mr. Duesterhaus seems to think his right to vote trumps our right to free speech, which I vehemently disagree with (and have court cases which agree). I would remind him that we don’t work for him. He says this is “too important” to vote on a bypass — and if he would care to find ANYBODY who would get up to speak against this I’d be more than interested to hear them. On the other hand, I’ve found no end of people who support the free speech aspect of this ordinance.”

Mayor says Sparks is right person for the job

Posted by – July 17, 2009

Those in the community who search for clouds amid sunny skies will invariably point to the Gary Sparks appointment with glee.

“Ha!” they’ll sneer. “It’s back to the future” for Mayor John Spring, who reached back into the Chuck Scholz administration to hire a new director of administrative services to replace Kenny Cantrell, who retired May 29.

Sparks was Scholz’s director of administrative services from 1993 to 1999, and how he’ll be Spring’s right-hand man starting in late August.

Some of the nay-sayers will no doubt take some jabs at Spring, who has been trying for four years to emerge from Scholz’s shadow.

But Spring has an answer for those people. He simply insists he picked the right man for the job.

Spring said he interviewed three candidates from inside city government and four outsiders, including Sparks. “I just felt at this time Gary was the best choice,” Spring said.

Spring had high praise for Sparks at a Friday morning press conference an in interviews — for good reason.

Sparks received generally strong reviews during his previous tenure as director of administrative services. He’s intelligent, likable, hard working and strives to get along with people.

He’s also a good manager who has vast experience with budgets and labor negotiations.

“Gary is very good with numbers and always has been,” Spring said.

He’s also good at the bargaining table.

“That’s another feather in Gary’s cap,” Spring said. “He has a lot of experience in dealing with that — as a matter of fact, more experience than anyone I interviewed.”

Sparks, a former Democratic alderman for 12 1/2 years, is coming off a highly successful 13-month stint as executive director of the Quincy Housing Authority, where he also received high marks for his administrative skills. He’s credited with helping turn around some troubling trends in a fairly brief period.

“Gary’s done a terrific job over there in the short time that he’s been director,” Spring said. “He put the Quincy Housing Authority on solid ground and just kept it moving forward.”

Spring said this shows Sparks has some natural administrative and leadership ability.

“I think Gary, when he came in there, just realized that they needed to do some things,” Spring said. “Gary had the experience and the knowledge to get those things done.”

One person who praised Spring’s appointment was Scholz, the former mayor.

“There’s nobody better suited for that position,” Scholz told The Herald-Whig. “He is a natural problem-solver and has a tremendous financial grasp.”

Scholz also said Sparks has is a level-headed individual with a great ability to get along with people.

Here’s one example of what Gary Sparks is all about. When we inquired about his current salary with the QHA, Sparks noted that he currently earns $68,000 a year. He said he was slated to get a raise to $71,000 last December, but he refused to take it.

“I waived the increase because I had to lay some folks off, and I didn’t feel like it was right for me to take an increase,” he said.

Sparks will be paid $85,000 in his new job, which is essentially what Cantrell was making. Spring, and many others, feel it will be money well spent.

Cantrell’s replacement to be named Friday

Posted by – July 16, 2009

Mayor John Spring plans to hold a press conference at 9:30 a.m. Friday to introduce a new director of administrative services to replace Ken Cantrell.

The mayor’s office issued a press advisory Thursday afternoon announcing the press conference, which will take place in the City Council chambers at City Hall.

Cantrell, 57, retired May 29 after working for the city for just over 20 years, including the last four years as Spring’s right-hand man.

Black receives copy of city’s forum proposal

Posted by – July 16, 2009

Quincy resident Michael Black, who is urging the City Council to hold public forums during each weekly council meeting, received a response this week from a Freedom of Information Act request he filed with the city.

The FOIA request sought copies of all communications, including e-mails, between Corporation Counsel Andrew Staff and Mayor John Spring regarding Black’s citizen forum petition. He did this, he said, “to see what has happened to my petition,” which he presented at the council’s May 11 meeting.

Black received an e-mail response from Staff, who offered up a draft of a proposed public forum meetings ordinance that he prepared at the request of Spring after the May 11 meeting.

As was previously reported, Staff’s proposed ordinance calls for a public forum to be held once a month on a Wednesday night chaired by two council members on a rotating basis. This is not at all what Black had in mind with his petition, which he is still pursuing. But at least now he has a copy of Staff’s proposal in writing. Here’s what Staff sent him:

2.114 Public forum meetings — Monthly public forum meetings shall be held in the council chambers at City Hall on each third Wednesday of every month at the hour of 7 p.m., provided that if such meeting falls on a legal holiday, the meeting shall take place on the next day at the same hour and place. The purpose of the public forum meetings is to allow the citizens of the City of Quincy an opportunity to raise ideas, comments or concerns of matters related to the City of Quincy before representatives of City Council. The Mayor shall select, from time to time, two aldermen who will jointly chair the public forum meetings. The aldermanic chair persons may report back and make recommendations, if any, to City Council on any matter arising out of such public forum meetings. The public forum meetings shall be conducted in an informal but orderly manner, so as to allow open discussion and debate on City related matters. The aldermanic chair persons shall ultimately control the agenda of such public forum meetings and the manner in which they are conducted.

Black had this to say about the response from the city:

“At long last we now get to see the silly idea of a once-a-month meeting in writing. Alderman Jennifer Lepper had requested this weeks ago with no luck. So I put in a FOIA request. Of course, this isn’t actually in the form of an ordinance. So far, I haven’t found one person who actually supports this idea (except Mr. Staff and the Mayor). On the other hand, everybody I’ve talked to or read supports having the forum at every council meeting. So the disconnect between Mayor Spring and virtually ALL of his constituents is quite apparent to me. And I think the city council proved this point when they unanimously voted to let Steve McQueen speak this week on his subject of “anything.” I don’t think anybody on the council will vote against my ordinance — it would be nigh on to political suicide. And, being an ordinance reading they may have to vote against it three times! Not likely me thinkst…”

Empty seats leave one County Board committee thin

Posted by – July 15, 2009

Things looked a little off at Tuesday night’s Adams County Board meeting.

The seating arrangement for the 21-member board calls for the chairman, Mike McLaughlin, to sit at an elevated desk in front of the room, while the 20 other board members sit in four groups of five. Each five-person cluster represents one of the board’s four standing committees.

The Transportation, Building and Technology Committee appeared unusually thin Tuesday because three of its members were missing:

• Billy Bennett, D-2, died May 24, and his seat has not yet been filled.

• Melvin “Bud” Niekamp, R-7, resigned Saturday, hoping to avert a legal challenge to his dual service on both the County Board and the Quincy School Board.

• Don McCleary, R-6, resigned in May to avoid any potential conflict with his service on the Liberty School Board, to which he was re-elected in April. McLaughlin named Clayton farmer John Brady to fill McCleary’s seat, but Brady couldn’t attend Tuesday’s meeting and won’t be sworn in until next month.

That left the two remaining members of the committee sitting by themselves — Rick Gengenbacher, R-5, and Robert Scott, R-7, the committee’s chairman.

“It’s kind of lonely up here,” Scott said at one point during the meeting.

“Now you know how I feel,” responded McLaughlin, sitting by himself.

One of the County Board’s empty seats was filled Tuesday by McLaughlin’s appointment of Nick Peters, who returned to his old District 1 seat after an absence of more than two years. Peters, a Democrat, resigned in March 2007 because his National Guard unit was being deployed to the Middle East. Jerry Q. Smith filled in until he voluntarily stepped aside last month so Peters could have his seat back.

Peters received an ovation and was greeted warmly by some of his old colleagues after being sworn in Tuesday.

“Welcome back, soldier,” said John Heidbreder, who stood up and extended a hand to Peters.

Peters expressed gratitude to Smith for giving up the seat so Peters could have it back, noting it was gracious move on Smith’s part.

Though Smith didn’t serve on the board for long, he clearly enjoyed the experience and showed he’s extremely capable. He routinely asked good questions and made incisive comments on key issues.

Smith told The Herald-Whig last month he’d like to return to the board some day. His problem is all three District 1 seats are currently filled by fellow Democrats — Peters, Richie Reis and Connie Sparks. So that means he’d create some upheaval within the party if he were to challenge one of the incumbents. So instead, he’s more likely to sit back and wait for an opening to occur.

You never know. With the way changes have been occurring so quickly on the County Board in recent months, he might not have to wait long.

John Brady to be named to County Board

Posted by – July 13, 2009

Adams County Board Chairman Mike McLaughlin told The Herald-Whig today he plans to name Clayton farmer John R. Brady to the District 6 seat formerly held by Don McCleary.

The appointment will be announced at the board’s monthly meeting Tuesday night.

McCleary, a Republican from Liberty, resigned from the County Board in May to avoid any potential conflict with his service on the Liberty School Board, to which he was re-elected in April.

McLaughlin asked the Republican precinct committeemen in District 6 to provide him with the name of their recommended candidate for the vacant seat, and “the majority of the committeemen were favor” of Brady.

McLaughlin said Diane McCleary, Don’s wife, finished second in the balloting by committeemen.

McLaughlin said Mrs. McCleary had expressed an interest in serving on the County Board. In fact, she has been a regular attendee at County Board meetings for many months — even while her husband was still serving on the board.

But the nod instead went to Brady, who was elected in April to a trustee position in Clayton Township.

McLaughlin also said he plans on Tuesday to appoint Quincy Democrat Nick Peters to the seat he formerly held for 11 years. Peters resigned in March 2007 because his National Guard unit was being deployed to the Middle East. Jerry Q. Smith, who replaced Peters, voluntarily stepped aside last month so Peters could get his old seat back.

McLaughlin still must find a replacement to fill the District 2 vacancy caused by the May 24 death of longtime Democratic member Billy Bennett. And now he also will have to find a replacement in District 7 for Republican Melvin “Bud” Niekamp, who submitted a letter of resignation this past weekend in the hope he’ll be able to retain his challenged seat on the Quincy School Board.

City Engineer issues plea to motorists

Posted by – July 10, 2009

City Engineer Jeff Steinkamp has seen all sorts of crazy things involving motorists who encounter construction sites along local streets.

Out of concern for the public’s safety, he finally issued a plea this week.

“Please, citizens of Quincy, do not drive around barricades or barriers — or move them,” Steinkamp said in an interview after Monday night’s Quincy City Council meeting. “I was out on a job site today and I tell you, they just drive around them, drive right up to the hole in the street and stare are you like, ‘What?’ ”

Steinkamp implores local motorists to “obey the barricades.” They’re there for a good reason — to keep cars out.

“It’s a city ordinance,” he said. “You can’t drive around a barricade. And don’t move them. I’ve seen guys get out of their car, slide the barricade to the side, go on by, and not even slide it back. Then here comes another string of cars. You just wouldn’t believe what you see out there.”

So he is beseeching the public: “Watch the construction zones. Don’t drive around barricades and don’t move barricades. It’s just for their own safety.”

Steve McQueen responds to Hayden’s clarification

Posted by – July 9, 2009

Steve McQueen speaks at a Quincy City Council meeting.

Steve McQueen speaks at a Quincy City Council meeting.

In the wake of Wednesday’s blog post that gave City Clerk Jenny Hayden the opportunity to clarify the rules on addressing the Quincy City Council, Steve McQueen now offers a different take on things.

McQueen, you may recall, was the fellow who properly signed up to speak at the council’s May 4 meeting, but when his turn on the agenda came along, aldermen voted 7-6 not to “suspend the rules,” thereby preventing him from speaking. This triggered the firestorm that prompted Michael Black to come forward with his proposal to have an open public forum during each council meeting.

McQueen was understandably a little put off to see Hayden say the public can talk about “anything they wish” at council meetings. After all, he was prevented from talking about anything whatsoever — until the council relented the following week and allowed McQueen to have the floor for five minutes.

McQueen also pointed to comments made after the May 4 meeting by Alderman Steve Duesterhaus and others who suggested that speakers at council meetings are expected to “speak to the question” currently before the council, rather than ramble on about any old topic they want.

Here’s what McQueen had to say in a condensed version of an e-mail he sent to this blog:

“I am astounded to find out that City Clerk Jenny Hayden says she wants the public to know they can talk about anything they wish at Quincy City Council meetings. I have to ask myself if Mayor Spring who spoke so adamantly against my right to speak just a few weeks ago supports Ms. Hayden’s view. I further want to ask Alderman Duesterhaus, Alderman Goehl, Alderman Bauer, Alderman Bumbry, Alderman Vahlkamp. Alderman Reis, and Alderman Holtschlag who voted to deny my right to speak before the City Council if they were aware that this is the city’s policy? It seems they may not have received the memo. Or have I been removed from the Quincy Public? Was it a mistake? Did their letter of apology get lost in the mail?

“When I signed the form requesting to speak, the subject (Budget/ Water & Sewer Fee Increases) was the same both weeks so I have to ask what changed for Alderman Goehl, Alderman Bauer, Alderman Bumbry, Alderman Vahlkamp, Alderman Reis, and Alderman Holtschlag in week two that suddenly made my request worthy? Why didn’t Alderman Duesterhaus feel the winds of change? I will leave it to the Citizens of Quincy to decide.

“I take exception to the fact that: Ms. Hayden called The Herald-Whig to take exception to a story in Tuesday’s edition that said citizens wishing to speak to the council must ask to appear on the agenda, and they must address topics listed on the agenda. Hayden said it’s true that citizens must ask to appear on the agenda, but ‘you don’t have to speak to something that’s on the agenda.’ She said citizens can talk about ‘anything they want.’ Unless the Council doesn’t think they might approve of the content of their speech. I find this particularly amusing since Alderman Duesterhaus emailed me to let me know that he would be glad to allow me to speak if I would change my topic? Of course, I declined his offer.

“I was voted down when I requested to speak on a subject that was not specifically listed on the agenda. If I wasn’t voted down for that reason, what was the reason? Per Mayor Spring whom I had never met before that night, my speech wasn’t going to be appropriate. I am not sure how you judge what a citizen might say before they’ve said it, but these are his words not mine. I was also told that by sitting quietly in the Council Chambers I was somehow disruptive. ‘That group’ was mentioned often: Did the Mayor not approve of my choice of friends and colleagues?”

McQueen also offered comments on Black’s proposed weekly public forums during council meetings and a proposed ordinance drafted by the corporation counsel that calls for public forums once a month on a Wednesday night:

“The City-Drafted proposal and Ms. Hayden’s comments seem to allude to the fact that the Citizens of Quincy can’t remember all that has occurred over the past eight weeks. Does our city government really believe that we aren’t paying attention? I assure you that would be an incorrect analysis of the situation and a dire mistake on the part of City Hall. The tactics of the recent past where a statement can be issued to the media and it prevails because no one remembers the facts are long over. People are watching, informed, and fed up with politics as usual in Quincy….

“Mr. Black’s proposal is currently Quincy’s only Constitutional answer to government by the people. Unfortunately, we have no alternative but to make sure Mr. Black’s proposal passes to get us through to the next several elections. At that time we will engage the process to remove those that swore to uphold the Constitution and failed to do so.”

City Clerk clarifies rule on addressing council

Posted by – July 8, 2009

City Clerk Jenny Hayden says she wants the public to know they can talk about anything they wish at Quincy City Council meetings.

Hayden called The Herald-Whig to take exception to a story in Tuesday’s edition that said citizens wishing to speak to the council must ask to appear on the agenda, and they must address topics listed on the agenda. Hayden said it’s true that citizens must ask to appear on the agenda, but “you don’t have to speak to something that’s on the agenda.” She said citizens can talk about “anything they want.”

Those who wish to speak on unrelated topics will be placed at the end of the agenda, she said.

This issue came up as part of a discussion about Michael Black’s proposal to allow a public forum during each council meeting so residents could speak on any topic they wish for up to three minutes, without first asking to appear on the agenda.

Black’s proposal — along with a city-drafted proposal that calls instead for holding public forums once a month on a Wednesday night — remains on hold while city officials await the hiring of a new director of administrative services. The new director presumably would be involved in deciding what proposal, if any, will eventually be presented to the council for consideration.

The story has been generating reaction from people who support Black’s efforts to get a public forum in conjunction with weekly council meetings.

For example, one woman who called The Herald-Whig this week said: “I fully support Mr. Black and what he’s doing.”

This caller said she was irked by Mayor John Spring’s comment that council meetings could get overly long if a forum was added to the proceedings each Monday.

“That’s why we, the people, voted them in and why we, the people, are paying them,” she said. “If they vote this down ever, it’s because they really aren’t serving we, the people.”