Month: February 2010

Quinn budget short on detail about funding

Posted by – February 24, 2010

Gov. Pat Quinn’s budget plan for 2011 calls for about $2.5 billion in cuts from the 2010 budget.

Quinn’s special Web site, which is linked here, simply expects that additional revenues will make up about $11 billion that is needed to balance the budget — beyond the cuts that are mentioned above.

The Web site is supposed to allow members of the public to give Quinn suggestions on how to balance the budget. He already has said he wants some major tax increases. His fellow Democrats who hold majorities in the House and Senate, say tax increases won’t get the votes needed this year.

Meanwhile, schools and hospitals, state agencies and municipalities all wonder when … or if, the state will ever catch up on its overdue bills.

Other agencies wonder how they’ll survive if a full $13 billion in cuts have to be made to balance the spending plan.

No matter how this budget gets worked out, there will be plenty of pain to go around.

Illinois Supreme Court denies pension to Ryan

Posted by – February 19, 2010

Jailed former Gov. George Ryan has lost his bid to get back a portion of the state pension that was stripped after he was convicted of corruption.

In a 6-1 decision the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that Ryan must forfeit all of his pension. That reverses a February 2009 appellate court ruling, which would have given Ryan the pension benefits he earned between 1972 and 1989 when he was in the General Assembly and was lieutenant governor.

Although the high court agreed that Ryan was convicted of felonies committed between 1990 and 2002, when he was secretary of state and governor, the justices in their judgment said the statute involving pensions still warrants forfeiture “for crimes committed against the employer, in this case the state of Illinois.”

Ryan was seeking to retain a pension of about $60,000 a year. Before his conviction and 6.5-year sentence for fraud and racketeering, Ryan was entitled to $197,000 a year.

Regional connection involved in unpaid leave decision

Posted by – February 18, 2010

Jerry Dowell

Jerry Dowell

Jerry Dowell, a deputy lieutenant governor, has been put on unpaid leave for five days after he sent an invitation to a political fundraiser through a state e-mail account.

Dowell may not be well known to those outside Missouri government circles, but he was a chief of staff and top spokesman for former state Sen. John Cauthorn, R-Mexico. Those who had much contact with Cauthorn will remember Dowell as the aide who helped smooth out some of the wording for his boss.

Dowell now works on Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder’s staff, but he was trying to help out his old boss during his noon hour Monday. Cauthorn, who was term-limited out of the Senate in 2007, is running for a House seat as Rep. Steve Hobbs, R-Mexico, leaves due to term limits.

The mistake that cost Dowell a week’s pay occurred when he mistakenly used a Tour of Missouri e-mail account to send along an invitation to a Cauthorn fundraiser. Under Missouri ethics rules, and those in most other states as well, government e-mail accounts are never to be used for campaign purposes.

Rich AuBuchon, Kinder’s chief of staff, believes the error was unintentional. That did not excuse the ethical lapse, and he put Dowell on unpaid leave.

In the grand scheme of things, it probably will not be the kiss of death for Dowell. It also gets Cauthorn’s name in the press again after years of silence — although not in a particularly good way.

Cauthorn has the distinction of being the man who gave the Republicans a majority in the Missouri Senate for the first time in decades in a special election in early 2001.

Cauthorn was a political newcomer when he defeated state Rep. Robert Clayton, D-Hannibal, thanks to a negative political advertising barrage in which his campaign cast Clayton as pro-abortion and pro-gun control. By the time Clayton responded, his unfavorable numbers were too high to overcome.

Hare, Schilling congressional camps trading words

Posted by – February 15, 2010

The race between U.S. Rep. Phil Hare, D-Rock Island, and Republican challenger Bobby Schilling of Rock Island should have lots of fireworks.

Hare launched an eight-city re-election tour Monday with a visit to the Machinist’s Lodge in Quincy. At the conclusion to his speech, Hare took aim at some of Schilling’s comments after Republican Scott Brown won the U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts by defeating Attorney General Martha Coakley, the Democratic nominee — in a state that has been dominated by Democrats for generations.

“My opponent has said that if it can happen in Massachusetts it can happen here,” Hare said.

“Well, Bobby, I got some news for you. This is not Massachusetts and I am not Martha Coakley.”

That gave Schilling’s campaign some ammunition for a rebuttal.

“Obviously this isn’t Massachusetts, but this isn’t San Francisco either. Congressman Hare has a voting record that is more liberal than Nancy Pelosi’s,” Bobby Schilling’s son and campaign organizer Terry Schilling said.

The Schillings may need to provide the voting records from Hare’s three years in Congress to prove that statement.

On the other hand, Hare may need to come up with his source to back up his contention in Monday’s speech that 2.4 million jobs have been either created or saved through the federal stimulus program. That number has been widely refuted for months.

Schilling and Hare can agree on one thing: This campaign is going to be lively.

Hynes concedes, GOP divided and Cohen scandalized

Posted by – February 4, 2010

Illinois politics is never dull. It may be corrupt and dysfunctional, but never dull.

In the Democratic gubernatorial primary, Gov. Pat Quinn held an 8,090-vote edge 36 hours after the polls closed, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. Dan Hynes conceded defeat early today rather than demanding a recount.

State Sen. Bill Brady, R-Bloomington, had a 406-vote lead over fellow Senate member Kirk Dillard of Hinsdale in the Republican gubernatorial primary. Dillard has not conceded yet and hopes that provisional ballots and overseas military votes will give him victory.

The supporters of pawnbroker Scott Lee Cohen were overjoyed when he won the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor. They’re not as excited about his electability after the Chicago news media got copies of his domestic violence record. It shows that in 2005 Cohen was arrested and accused of holding a knife to the neck of a former girl friend, who also happened to be a prostitute. The charges were dropped after the 29-year-old woman failed to show up to testify in Cohen’s case.

Cohen’s former wife also sought an order of protection against him months earlier after she filed for divorce.

Logic would dictate that it’s better to be a clear-cut nominee, rather than someone whose nomination is still in doubt. Cohen’s situation could turn that conclusion on its head. Being the nominee when a bombshell scandal breaks is worse.

At least the eventual nominees may be able to raise funds and campaign with a fair shot at getting elected. But then, Cohen may be seeking votes from those who still like Rod Blagojevich.

Writer opines on backlash against Democrats

Posted by – February 1, 2010

Immediately after Scott Brown’s Senate victory in Massachusetts, everybody seemed to have an opinion about exactly how a Republican won Ted Kennedy’s old Senate seat in a state where Democrats are used to winning.

Greg Marx of the Columbia Journalism Review wrote a thoughtful analysis that warned readers that hundreds of thousands of voters send a mix of messages with their votes. Marx’s first analysis, which can be read here, talks about the fuzzy task of drawing a clear picture out of voter concerns about the direction the nation is headed.

Almost a week later, Marx talks about how the Senate deals made for Nebraska U.S. Sen. Ben Nelson’s vote on health care reform may have played a big part in Brown’s victory. Marx’s second analysis can be read here.

Whether Martha Coakley, the defeated Democratic candidate in Massachusetts, ran a bad campaign or Brown and the Republicans ran a good campaign gets lost in this and other commentary.

There is little doubt that the nation’s political mood has shifted from what it was in 2006 and 2008 when Democrats benefited from voter discontent. But those who believe they know exactly what lies at the heart of that mood shift are trying to simplify the complex election system that has thousands or millions of moving parts: The voters.

It would be easier to establish a top 10 list of voter concerns than to argue that one and only one issue has led to voter discontent.