Category: Quincy City Government

Obstacles remain for hydropower to generate energy, profits

Posted by – August 29, 2010

Jeffrey Tomich of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch exams efforts by developers to use the Mississippi River as a power source at a dozen locations between southeast Iowa and the Missouri Bootheel, including the city of Quincy at Lock and Dam 21.

The city of Quincy last month applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a license to build a 15-megawatt hydroelectric project at Lock and Dam 21. The problem is, that process could take up to a year, and none of the potential equity partners that have expressed an interest in the $100 million project appear to want to commit money until the license is in hand. That means the city can’t tap into $30 million in federal stimulus money unless it spends $5 million of its own money by Dec. 31, or unless that deadline is extended by Congress.

Despite the possibilities hydropower development presents — and experts point out several in the article — trying to raise capital for the expensive projects in this economy, dealing with a “long and arduous” licensing process, the scrutiny facing new technologies and the inevitable environmental concerns are considered the major stumbling blocks.

Writes Tomich:

… They all share a common goal: to harness the river’s flow to cash in on the booming interest in renewable power. But each group likewise faces an undercurrent of financial and regulatory challenges that have dashed developers’ hopes in the past.

Can those hurdles be cleared? That question remains to be answered.

Aldermanic courtesy apparently a thing of the past in Quincy

Posted by – August 24, 2010

Tony Sassen

It used to be that if both aldermen from a ward either supported or opposed a proposal involving their constituency, the rest of the Quincy City Council went along. It was an unwritten acknowledgment that those aldermen knew what was best for their ward, and other aldermen wanted the same courtesy extended if a thorny issue came up in their ward.

Mike Farha

That went out the window Monday night when all seven Democrats and one Republican voted against the wishes of 4th Ward aldermen Mike Farha and Tony Sassen, both Republicans, on the zoning controversy involving the bungalow at 2002 Maine. Farha and Sassen spent considerable time in recent months talking with Dr. Louis Quintero, who wants to demolish the house and put up a professional building to house his dental practice, and preservationists and nearby residents who opposed losing another century-old structure in the historic district.

Farha and Sassen have mirrored the wishes of most 4th Ward residents by consistently opposing the expansion of commercial zoning in residential areas, perhaps the touchiest issue in the central part of the city. They stayed true to that philosophy after receiving considerable input from both sides, but were undercut by eight aldermen who apparently thought they knew better. Or who maybe voted the way they were told to vote.

We don’t know for sure because six of the eight didn’t utter a word during a debate that lasted nearly an hour.

Zoning regulations are apparently meant to be broken

Posted by – June 29, 2010

What do the cell tower at St. Peter Catholic Church, the sign in front of the new Adams County Health Department and the proposed electronic message board at Salem Evangelical United Church of Christ all have in common?

All are expressly prohibited by ordinance, which aldermen at some point approved, and the Quincy City Council chose to not enforce any of them. Why have rules if you’re not going to follow them? Why have professional planners if you’re going to ignore them?